The propaganda arm of the Obama White House, otherwise known as the New York Times, has this little gem of
news analysis by Helene Cooper on life after Bashar al-Assad:
The Obama administration is determined to avoid a repeat of the aftermath of the American invasion of Iraq. Though the United States did not stint in its effort to oust Saddam Hussein, many foreign policy experts now say that the undertaking came at the expense of detailed planning about how to manage Iraq’s warring factions after his removal.
You see, while still blaming Bush for Iraq, Cooper's point is that Obama is way too smart to allow the non-linear dynamics of a volatile Syria to go unmanaged. And to prove it, the president is meeting with Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey at the U.N. to smooth the way.
Erdogan is the same guy that's been hostile to the U.S. and its support of Israel of late, and has rapidly moved Turkey from its decades long secularism towards an Islamic state. Obama, by relying on another America hater to ensure our interests, is following the failed policies of his north Korea and Iran approaches where he assumes the sheer magic of his personality will make tyrants and despots forget where their real self-interests lie.
Not to worry. In Obama's mind, the fact that he had dialogue will equal success. Meanwhile, that sucking sound you hear will be American influence vacating the middle east.
If Obama was merely opining in his sophomoric way in some progressive foreign policy rag, that would be harmless. But what the President of the United States says has widespread, downstream effects that could spell danger for our citizens and allies. As with the outing of Seal Team Six after the bin Laden hit, our president seems to have precious little grasp of operational security:
While other countries have withdrawn their ambassadors from Damascus, Obama administration officials say they are leaving in place the American ambassador, Robert S. Ford, despite the risks, so he can maintain contact with opposition leaders and the leaders of the country’s myriad sects and religious groups.
After all, what could go wrong by telling a murderous dictator like Assad that U.S. representatives in Syria are openly coordinating his downfall and possible execution at the hands of the opposition.
And if the U.S. is "quietly" getting ready for a post Assad Syria, that must explain Obama months long inactivity and refusal to shape events after the Syrian uprisings began; just as Obama squandered the initial momentum of the Iranian revolt, blowing the chance to jump start badly needed political and social reforms.
The fact is Obama has no foreign policy or mechanisms in place to ensure American interests. I seriously doubt the president knows what American interests are. Meanwhile, instead of doing her job, the secretary of state is whining that more women should be in politics. (I'm sure a costly, inefficient government program to ensure equal outcomes in political races is not far behind.) And the NYT, once a great paper, has sunk to cheerleading for a failed president and hope bringer.
Good luck, America, you're going to need it.